Wikipedia redirects Dimensionality to Dimension. Pity, for Dimensionality is a most important ‘qualitative attribute’ of Measuring Units. Wikipedia also distinguishes between Dimension in maths; Dimension in physics; and a considerable list of other areas. No wonder Einstein spotted a gap … Continue reading →
In the grand scheme of things, the ‘domain space’, I am combining geometry with number theory. As a result, geo-metric constructs are scalable – within their dimensionality. And numerical relationships become visible. Conceptually, “Digital Numbers” provide a new tool for … Continue reading →
Definitions: n2 + m = 2D Unit + 1D Unit 12 + 1 = 2 “Multi-Dimensional Sums” take into consideration the different ‘dimensional quality’ of their summands. The formula of letters hides the ‘compounding’ of dimensionality into the value ‘1’. … Continue reading →
I get the impression that numbers are perceived to be ‘technical’ – presumably because of their usefulness for calculations. That’s what women tend not to like. Men, however, are desperately trying to build world views from physics, for that’s been … Continue reading →
We Think Freely Radio [WTFR] has been a lifeline thanks to co-host Martin Houston. After Martin saw my spreadsheet patterns, he mentioned that I can use Python to read and write spreadsheets! So I shall embark on that chapter once … Continue reading →
Geometric constructs are proportionately scaleable, especially when Dimensionality is taken into account. When the Number Line is complemented by “Digital Number PLANES” and “Digital Number SPACES”, we have wholly abstract “Quantification Models” to match our real worlds: quantum physics of … Continue reading →
I keep having to change and renumber and switch brain between #AmazingPatterns in ‘beautiful pictures’ and #VisualClarity in ‘meaningful spreadsheets’. As ‘icons’, pictures are #DigitalAssets which means Non-Fungible Tokens [NFTs] – the only way of copyrighting digital art and swimming … Continue reading →